![who directed the da vinci code who directed the da vinci code](http://www.solarnavigator.net/films_movies_actors/actors_films_images/silas_priest_paul_bettany_the_da_vinci_code.jpg)
Who directed the da vinci code code#
The rollercoaster ride known as The Da Vinci Code takes off from this absurd foundation. Instead, I’m talking about nitty-gritty stuff like plot holes and illogical storytelling: What in God’s name (pun intended) was the old man doing in a darkened gallery in the Louvre in the middle of the night? Why did his killer let him live long enough to spread those bloody clues all over the place? And why didn’t the old man simply write down the identity of his killer (and those behind him), instead of coming up with anagrams that only someone possessing a Beautiful Mind like Tom Hanks’ symbologist Robert Langdon could decipher? (It’s not as if the conspirators would be willing to reveal The Secret to the police or to the French FBI, since the bad guys’ sole purpose is to keep The Secret secret.) These are only theological stuffing used as an excuse to propel the narrative of a mindless thriller. Nope, I’m not referring to the mysteries surrounding the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, the Templar Knights, the Holy Grail as a symbolic representation of the Holy Vagina, or Jesus’ divinity or lack thereof. In any case, the dying old man is granted enough time to use his own blood to draw symbols and anagrams on his body, on the floor, and on the wall nearby. I could swear I saw the old man get shot in the head, but despite the killer’s Dirty Harry-esque determination, his aim clearly left a lot to be desired. For his uncooperativeness, he gets a bullet in the stomach. Another man – the evil twin of Rutger Hauer’s Blade Runner robot – shows up. An old man is walking alone in a darkened gallery in the Louvre.